حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ يُونُسَ أَنَّ شَرِيکًا وَأَبَا الْأَحْوَصِ وَأَبَا بَکْرِ بْنَ عَيَّاشٍ حَدَّثُوهُمْ عَنْ عَاصِمٍ عَنْ أَبِي رَزِينٍ عَنْ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ لَيْسَ عَلَی الَّذِي يَأْتِي الْبَهِيمَةَ حَدٌّ قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُد وَکَذَا قَالَ عَطَائٌ و قَالَ الْحَکَمُ أَرَی أَنْ يُجْلَدَ وَلَا يُبْلَغَ بِهِ الْحَدَّ و قَالَ الْحَسَنُ هُوَ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الزَّانِي قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُد حَدِيثُ عَاصِمٍ يُضَعِّفُ حَدِيثَ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍو
سنن ابودوٗد · Hadith 4465
Asim reported from Abu Razin on the authority of Ibn Abbas saying: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal. Abu Dawud said: Ata is also so. Al Hakam said: I think he should be flogged, but the number should not reach the one of the prescribed punishment. Al-Hasan said: He is like a fornicator. Abu Dawud said: THe tradition of Asim proves the tradition of Amr bin Abi Amr as weak.
Translated by Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan · Reviewed by Islamic University of Madinah · Published March 2020